So then my hour of talking to you and YOU still not understanding it just magically changed AFTER I posted the 2k DPS numbers? I believe your exact words of the conversation were 'I guess we will have to agree to disagree here' talking about the amount of DPs that could have gotten and was not gotten. Also, I am about 95% sure you said something to the tune of 'It was known about since week 2 of beta where were you guys then?' That is an accusation of sorts.Voragath wrote:Well, if you think of the two as separate, then sorry. I have the two married. My apologies.Piemastaj wrote:I did not say you were out for yourself or personally attack you. I said you have a way of looking at things only your way, not doing things only for yourself. Those are 2 completely different things.
I never accused anyone of anything. I simply asked where was all the foul crying when I made it known that EM 14 was missing.Piemastaj wrote: As to your mind-set. Your complacency with Fire pet being only buffed with FBO out-DPSing a fully buffed Water. Your claiming to be good at ADPS and you could not figure out how we were losing out with the new Strike change vs the old Clash nuke, even after I spent I want to say over an hour explaining it to you in an IRC chat room with another mage there (Possibly Sven, not 100% sure though). The fact that your dismissing what Savil is saying simply because he is not in-game currently, when in all reality there are enough formulas out there that we would not need to log 1 ounce of game-time to see what a mage's maximum potential is for VoA. The fact that you accused me and other beta mages of not complaining enough in beta about EM 14 earring not being in-game. When I personally was too busy parsing among other things to make sure the game worked properly, and you knew about it from week 2 of beta and failed to tell any1 or even post about it in our class threads so we could voice our opinions on the fact that lower-end guilds got screwed on it. Your whole mind-set comes off strongly as 'well we did not get what we asked for in X, but we got increases in Y so be happy', and to me that is a bad attitude/mind-set. We should not just be happy we got thrown a bone, we should be upset we got ignored again about a crucial issue.
The fire pet was asked for by the community for a long, long, long time. It's still not a great pet for raids and raid mages will still be using water pet. In groups, sure, it's better than water. Air pet is great solo or off-tank for anything 95 and lower. Earth is a great tank everywhere (and still needs his freaking aggro looked at, grr). So, before fire pet was only good because he did ok dps and didn't need to be buffed and this was in raids. Any other time it was water. Before HoT, it was air-pet all the time unless you had a tank and some cc and then it was water pet all the time. We had TWO useful pets. We now have 4. Earth: tanking nameds and trash greater than 95; Water: raid dps and group dps with lots of great melee buffing; Fire: great group dps and even better to plop out in middle of raid when water pet dies; Air: Great solo pet for mobs 95 or lower. And I still hold that the pets need dps and I will always say that even if they make the pets yank out 100k dps with /pet attack. My stance was that Fire is fine but using him as a benchmark was not going to win Aristo over; and he was not impressed, btw.
I understood where the loss on Strike was. Without taking in crit chance, it's only a modest 2k damage increase over the old and that's an extremely conservative number as I erred on the side of caution with SD and used only flat chance procs. And I am still trying to get Aristo to fix the spell to be like it was. What you didn't understand was that if Aristo flat out refuses to add them back, there needs to be another way to try and recoup the lost damage.
My mindset has not changed one bit. And this is funny because everyone who knows me in real life calls me the most bull-headed person they ever met. The only thing that has changed is my approach and my view on the community as a whole. There were things I wasn't aware of going on that has changed how some things have to get done. The reason why sometimes we don't get x but got y is good is because the community doesn't realize how close they came to making sure they got zero. A good example is when the dev says something isn't possible by code. The community pushing for a code fix is just silly because the end result of the idea is implicitly ok'd and we have to find another route; if we don't find another route, we get nothing.Piemastaj wrote: As to Sven. Savil and myself are not upset that Vora is doing CRT. We are both happy that a mage got in there. What is upsetting is seeing a person change their attitude and their vision on issues in such a quick period of time. It is making me think that the kool-aid had something done to it.
The difference here is I'm willing to adapt to get what we want. Some aren't so willing and want that one approach to work come hell or high water. It won't happen, ever.
That still is a piss poor mentality. That is like being fine with a C in school on a project that deserved an A. No1 in their right mind would be happy with that, we shouldn't either. That type of mentality is why we are in the spot we are in. It is by no means a hell or high water, it is a' we are sick of being where we are, and u just did to rogues what we needed done to us, why are we the red-headed step child and get nothing?'. Again, if it is possible to give a class such huge numbers before they actually get their back-loadedness you can not possibly tell me it is too hard for mages to get it done also.
And you can back-track or try to change things around all you want, but at the end of the day I do infact know your trying to change your story around to sound better then what it actually was.